The definition of critical care varies depending on the discipline of the clinician you ask – paramedic, registered nurse (RN), or physician. It also depends on whether the clinician practices in an urban or rural setting, or even which part of the US or the world they reference. The response ‘you know it when you see it’ brings to my mind a picture, but it may bring a different picture to the minds of others, all of whom claim to be critical care providers.
When the 11th Edition Accreditation Standards were published in 2018, we divided critical care into two separate categories as follows:
- Emergency critical care (ECC): Capability to deliver out-of-hospital care during the acute resuscitation phase before definitive care is provided (comparable to emergency department stabilizing care or an ICU transfer to more definitive care).
- Intensive critical care (ICC): Capability to deliver out-of-hospital care comparable to tertiary ICU care during interfacility transport to a higher-level tertiary ICU.
The intent was to continue to accredit at the ECC level only, but track and trend the numbers of clinical and quality metrics submitted with each accreditation application. Using this data, along with the care providers’ disciplines, experience, and training, the Board felt it would be able to define and differentiate ‘emergency’ from ‘intensive’ critical care in the 12th Edition Standards, and then begin to accredit at one or the other level of critical care.
Using this data, along with the care providers’ disciplines, experience, and training, the Board felt it would be able to define and differentiate ‘emergency’ from ‘intensive’ critical care
For example, performing certain procedures may indicate an ‘intensive’ level of critical care. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was one of the few interventions suggested as representative of ICC. But more and more programs were performing ECMO transports, and if they were using the appropriate team with current training and equipment, they would be in compliance with the standards. In many cases, some of the larger programs had bases that were able to perform ECMO and some that did not, depending on the needs and capabilities in a specific coverage area. It would be difficult to achieve accreditation as an entire company under separate types of critical care in this case, unless each base is accredited as either emergency or intensive critical care, presenting a logistical nightmare.
Data needed on critical care transports
As the Board discussed the ICC issue, there were other factors such as the number of each intervention performed, and education to perform and stay proficient. Even if a program only did a few advanced procedures a year – didn’t extensive and consistent training qualify as ICC? Although ECMO, intra-aortic balloon pump or Impella transports are typically performed infrequently – how few is not enough to differentiate between the types of critical care? Studies were not out there to answer these questions.
After many meetings and individual correspondence with the Association of Critical Care Transport, one of our member organizations, and the accredited programs that primarily provide interfacility transports to a higher level of care, the Board decided to combine ‘intensive’ and ‘emergency’ critical care into just one critical care definition.
The Board decided to combine ‘intensive’ and ‘emergency’ critical care into just one critical care definition.
The 12th Edition Standards, to be published later in 2022, will combine criteria formerly under the separate critical care headings into just ‘critical care’.